找回密碼
 新用戶註冊
搜索
熱搜: hifi av 音樂
樓主: hkborn

[CAS] QA860播放器

[複製鏈接]
發表於 2014-2-19 11:24:59 | 顯示全部樓層
Please also advise if just using QA660 and QA850 as player and connect it to seperate DAC, which one is better?

Tks
回復

使用道具 舉報

 樓主| 發表於 2014-2-19 14:14:21 | 顯示全部樓層
vpkl 發表於 2014-2-19 11:24
Please also advise if just using QA660 and QA850 as player and connect it to seperate DAC, which one ...

i personally don't think the sonic improvement from QA660 to QA860 is that huge. both players can easily beat pc/mac based players and performance is comparable to CD players.
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2014-2-19 22:20:31 | 顯示全部樓層
Thanks very much and will visit your shop .
Your shop open in Sunday or not?

Best Regards

回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2014-2-20 00:49:41 | 顯示全部樓層
謝謝分享
回復

使用道具 舉報

 樓主| 發表於 2014-2-20 16:16:07 | 顯示全部樓層
本帖最後由 hkborn 於 2014-2-20 16:24 編輯

reviewed by a young audiophile

Introduction

In a world where media player hardware often sacrifice efficiency and performance in favour of needless aesthetics, it is a relief that the QA860 exists as a simple yet effective all-in-one media player specifically for the playback of lossless audio files. Developing on from the QA660 model, the QA860 offers a greater package with a dedicated headphone amplifier, a preamplifier, and increased audio format support, including the WAV, AIFF, ALAC and DSD file formats. Furthermore, the preamplifier can be turned off so that the QA860 only functions as a DAC, which is recommended when connected to a system with a back end machine with a better volume control system.

Build Quality

While this reviewer is by no means any kind of expert with regards to understanding what kinds of materials are best chosen for the construction of audio devices, it is difficult to find any flaws in the QA860’s build. The metal casing shows no sign of wear in short term use and is as sturdy as one would expect from any kind of high-end audio equipment. The 2xAAA battery-powered remote has failed to disappoint in any way in terms of hardware functionality. I expect this to remain the case for the coming years of use and am very glad with the unit I have on hand.

Ease of Use

The operating system is easy to learn and simple to use, supporting up to three layers of files and folders and can be easily navigated mainly by using the remote. There is a slight learning curve in doing this but nothing that cannot easily solved by consulting the concise manual. Playback modes, such as the looping or inverted playback order, and some small variations in the aesthetic presentation, such as the colour and size of fonts, are accessible in the settings menu. Overall, everything from the display interfaces to the remote control’s ease of use is commendable.

Comparisons (Sound Quality)

As I had a Beyerdynamics T1 convenient on hand, I spent most of my first impressions with the QA860 going through some of the more familiar pieces in my music library. The T1 were driven effortlessly, giving it the spacious soundstage and clean highs that it prides itself with. In orchestral tracks, each instrument had its own individual presence and position, without any single feeling particularly overpowering unless the track called for it. I would say, however, that the treble area was harsh during songs with high-pitched female vocals but this is something that occurs often with the T1 and does not lower my impression of the QA860 at all.

QLS’ claim that the QA660 provides a “deep, dark background” also rings true with the QA860 and causes it to be very revealing of flawed recordings. In a few badly recorded music tracks, the sound of guitar strings became rather unfocused and was unappealing to listen to. However, this only serves to show how the QA860 succeeds in providing a transparent and accurate playback of each recording.

w/KS Digital ADM10 Studio Monitors

Hooking it up with a KS Digital ADM10 Studio Monitor, the harshness in the treble area becomes less obvious. (It should be noted that the ADM10 is an active monitor, meaning that for other speakers an external power amplifier may be necessary.) The impression I had of the QA860’s ability to reproduce music accurately remained true, but with the ADM10, I was particularly impressed with how the QA860 aided the imaging of each individual instrument within a wide and deep soundstage.

With the BM Ice 802 DAC, I compared the difference in sound signature between the two devices. The QA860, with its integrated preamplifier turned on and connected directly to the ADM10, favoured a tighter bass response. When outputting first to the Ice 802 with the QA860’s preamplifier turned off, the focal difference seems to be an increase in bass response. While I personally have no strong preference to either side, I find the former setup to be closer to what I consider to be a neutral sound signature.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the QA860 satisfies as a full package in terms of providing high quality, accurate music playback. Everything, from the player’s physical shape and form to the operating system’s functionality, is satisfying and reliable. The actual sound produced from the QA860, alone or with another DAC, is pleasant and fulfills QLS’ goal of providing an accurate rendition of the original recording. I highly recommend anyone looking for an all-in-one, do-it-all device or simply an upgrade to their digital source to consider the QA860.
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2014-2-21 10:26:32 | 顯示全部樓層
Hi,
Thanks very much for your report..

Best Regards
回復

使用道具 舉報

 樓主| 發表於 2014-3-3 13:22:08 | 顯示全部樓層
本帖最後由 hkborn 於 2014-3-3 13:57 編輯

新入手Qa860
138_556347_822d1c943a6e73f.jpg
138_556347_41571f7c54aa0cc.jpg
其实我早几年已经对电脑音文件甚有兴趣,尤其是24/192k高清檔,但曾经在家里尝试过用Pc notebook+foobar+dac ,但整体表现始终未能满意,与我原本用开的Wadia 转盆十 Audio synthesis(旧款) 解码器实在有很大距离,可能本身功力未够与未能花太多心机与时间揣摩,所以最终都放弃了。最近有位朋友推介有个内地品牌叫Qls ,已研发了几款数字转盆播放器,他在朋友家中听过 Qa-660数字转盆加一部中价Dac,表现相当不俗,这令我又再萌起玩计算机音文件的兴趣,后来在Qls官方网页上看到了这部Qa860旗舰级播放器原来是 改良自Qa660,加上内置独立译码与前级,看过了器材规格与工作原理,我对这部Qa860的设计师陈老板的见解与知识真的十分配服,更令我对这部器充满 期望,很幸运原来在香港深湾有间特约经销商,很多谢 Richie Audio 傅先生热情款待与详细讲解。
带回家后一开声已超出了我的预期,未热身状态下已感受到声音甚有质素,两极伸延甚隹,背景很静,音色暖厚,很合我的口味,经过了六天差不多一百小时 Run-in ,无论分析力、乐器分隔度、定位、结像力都毫不逊于我用开的 Wadia 加 Audio synthesis组合,唯独感情舆湿润感则较为低于我的CD组合,但相信再多Run-in 一段日子,距离一定会收窄,至于耳扩部分表现表算是中规中举,只因Line out太强相对之下有少许失色而已。对于今㳄投资确实非常高兴,基本上都称心满意,唯一挑剔算是兼容性不够,尤其是我大部份珍藏的24/192 flac都要经电脑转檔wav才可支持,较为不便,希望日后有新的 firmware 升级可解决。
Source: http://www.erji.net/read.php?tid=1616184&keyword=
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 新用戶註冊

本版積分規則

Archiver|小黑屋|聯絡我們|刊登廣告|Hiendy.com 影音俱樂部 一個屬於音響愛好者的家

GMT+8, 2026-5-14 13:59 , Processed in 0.028562 second(s), 15 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表