|
發表於 2016-11-12 21:14:23
|
顯示全部樓層
本帖最後由 blau.vol 於 2016-11-12 23:02 編輯
Dear emc1,
thanks for coming !!!
1. 其實這是最fair 的測試呢.... 所有機都用同一條 Westminister Labs Pure Silver USB cable ( 分析力比copper USB 高) . 我認為無話最好的輸出... 作為一間廠. 每個輸出都有人用, 而且USB 輸出, Aries 有 Femto clock for USB already, 所以唔可以話不好, factory emphasis on the femto clock in marketing on the other hand.
而且CAS 最主要係 USB,因只有USB可以播放 24/384 and DSD128x , 256x, 512x ...亦只有 USB 是所以機都有 , then we can eliminate digital cable 聲底 difference , and DAC side different digital input implementation 的分別 , 跟住我們先可以KEEP all other factors as constant and compare ONE variable . SO it is the MOST fair way .
Device list (按出場序):
1. auralic aries mini, 2. Innuos zen mini 3. auralic aries 4. Antipodes DS , 5. Innuos Zenith 6. Antipodes DX and 7. SGMS
3. The conclusion cannot be draw that way, as both DAC got different sonic signature . especially on bass .
DSD512x can eliminate the digital harshness , My friend and I compared "From the New world" , both of us prefer dst512x to dsd64x with better instrument separation ! DSD512x got huge density in playback , so, Symphony classical , Jazz got advantage too . as I have not demos on classical and jazz.
4. totalDAC d1-six (好好聲的, i have tried to compare something double with its cost and lose the race ) ! and d1-six got higher cost over Rockna WD DAC by quite some margin too....
5. Even both are R2R ladder dac, but they emphasis on different area and their implementation base on designer's skillset and sonic preference .... when we hear classical or Jazz which need density, there is very interesting story .
CHEERS MAN, Thank you for coming!
Blau
VOLENT
|
評分
-
1
查看全部評分
-
|