|
樓主 |
發表於 2019-1-23 16:36:17
|
顯示全部樓層
其實每一個情況是不同的
1. Roon and RoonReady (endpoint ) 情況有不同.
2. UPnP Server with UPnP Renderer 情況也有不同.
3. Server LAN port like Innuos and Clones got MUCH better clock for control 又唔同.
4.Server 與UPnP Renderer 之外, 有沒有For Audio switch ,情況也有不同.
1. Roon and RoonReady situation, 無 For audio grade switch, RoonCore to Router directly (or via FMC) :
-小弟有試 Roon on SGM EVO , with JPlay LAN card or Fiber card, Fiber card is more quiet on bridge MODE. but if u prefer to have more bass volume . and Innuos as Roon EndPoint , Bridge mode with FIber LAN is a good one.
2. Roon & RoonReady situation, with For Audio Grade Switch with LPS :
- 小弟覺得RoonReady 直上For Audio switch 比較好. 用 For audio switch as LAN re-clocker , the time internal may be even better (SGM Evo Fiber as ROON core, Innuos as ROON Endpoint
3.情形三 UPnP Server and UPnP Renderer , without for audio switch
- 用dual LAN server 比較好聲. 都明顯.
4. 情形四 UPnP Server and UPnP Renderer , with for audio switch
-用Dual LAN port server (via bridge mode), 同兩個都經for audio swtich , 有唔同聲. 但我認為Dual LAN port 有優勢.
5.情形五. Innuos Statement type server OCXO for streamer port vs For audio switch , 未試.......
這都只是小弟的系統的情況. 不能一概而論.....
Blau
|
評分
-
2
查看全部評分
-
|