找回密碼
 新用戶註冊
搜索
熱搜: hifi av 音樂
查看: 15884|回復: 85

[CAS] 更新: AO3.0 取代 Fidelizer 8.4

[複製鏈接]
發表於 2019-1-30 23:03:16 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式
 樓主| 發表於 2019-1-31 00:20:39 | 顯示全部樓層
小弟遲少少試下,再出報告

評分

1

查看全部評分

回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2019-1-31 09:08:47 | 顯示全部樓層
AO同Windows Server 2012襯到絕呀
回復

使用道具 舉報

 樓主| 發表於 2019-1-31 09:19:27 | 顯示全部樓層
MarcoTam@FB 發表於 2019-1-31 09:08
AO同Windows Server 2012襯到絕呀

評分

1

查看全部評分

回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2019-1-31 09:24:04 | 顯示全部樓層
AO works well in conjunction with Fidelizer
回復

使用道具 舉報

 樓主| 發表於 2019-1-31 09:25:44 | 顯示全部樓層
rocco1113 發表於 2019-1-31 09:24
AO works well in conjunction with Fidelizer

my friend

評分

1

查看全部評分

回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2019-1-31 19:24:37 | 顯示全部樓層
MarcoTam@FB 發表於 2019-1-31 09:08
AO同Windows Server 2012襯到絕呀

WS2016更佳。
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2019-1-31 19:25:42 | 顯示全部樓層
rocco1113 發表於 2019-1-31 09:24
AO works well in conjunction with Fidelizer

這個要耳聽為實,有些系統有反應,有些系統冇反應。
回復

使用道具 舉報

 樓主| 發表於 2019-1-31 20:19:52 | 顯示全部樓層
回復

使用道具 舉報

 樓主| 發表於 2019-1-31 21:14:06 | 顯示全部樓層
本帖最後由 vhs 於 2019-1-31 21:32 編輯

Quote:

"After, I started to use Fidelizer, Computer Audio Design scripts, until I got to Audiophile Optimizer, replacing Windows 8.1 with Server 2012R2 and then with Server 2016 (I tested all in Core and GUI modes), this with still unbeatable result on my system (I didn’t test Server 2019). For this, I needed a lot of reading and, after getting a course, I kept testing for myself. Windows Server 2016 made the system deliver more spatiality, better sense of time and space, larger soundstage and much more realism of timbres, voices, better scaling of instruments, which contributed to overall growth (and Core Mode even more than GUI Mode). I think that a mention to the operational system is very important, because it dictates the direction of all software performance. Even a stock Windows Server 2016 Standard GUI is better than Windows 8.1 with all CAD scripts.



If you use Windows Server 2016 Core Mode and Audiophile Optimizer, almost nothing must be done to get the same performance I got (and which I think is fairly good, given my experience with other systems and with real presentations). If you use a Windows Server 2016 GUI Mode and don’t use Audiophile Optimizer, at least some settings are interesting, such as disabling SSD/HDD caching, virtual memory, Firewall, Windows Defender, Windows sounds and OneDrive, and always remembering to use as few controllers as possible. Many things are written in the Audiophile Optimizer manual or can be easily located on the Internet. In my case, I haven’t done any of this, since Audiophile Optimizer does it all by itself (I still don’t know the Fidelizer interventions in depth, so I cannot speak properly).



To summarize everything that has been written so far about computers and operating systems, I say that for me, using one or two dedicated computers with Windows Server in Core mode is, by 2018, the best solution we can find in terms of sound quality. Nothing that I tested has even been able to be equated to a desktop computer with Windows Server as an operating system, a linear power supply and an audiophile USB card (and we can include a SATA audiophile cable as well), and the distance increases even more when using two computers, even if one of them isn't completely dedicated. But this, it’s good to stand out, only when the dedicated computer is the one that’s between the source (first computer) and the DAC, always. Reverse the roles, that is, put the dedicated computer at the beginning, with another device interposed, doesn’t seem so good. By 2019, I'm going to build a second dedicated computer, using well-selected components (specially JCAT Net FEMTO and USB FEMTO cards; I don't intend to continue in SOtM anymore) and trying to optimize the cost-benefit ratio. Only then, when I reach a level that I think is reasonable, I'll be able to afford the famous sMS-200 Ultra and UltraRendu to compare and test other software and gadgets like the ones I mentioned on my own system."

End Quote

from Jplay Forum FelipeRolim  

評分

2

查看全部評分

回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2019-2-1 00:52:40 | 顯示全部樓層
好撚煩啫。有冇D簡化版合我這樣的低燒友?  
回復

使用道具 舉報

 樓主| 發表於 2019-2-1 01:01:50 | 顯示全部樓層
本帖最後由 vhs 於 2019-2-1 01:05 編輯
dekiller 發表於 2019-2-1 00:52
好撚煩啫。有冇D簡化版合我這樣的低燒友?


冇呀, 你唔撚玩咪唔撚煩囉,屌

評分

2

查看全部評分

回復

使用道具 舉報

 樓主| 發表於 2019-2-1 01:09:29 | 顯示全部樓層
回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2019-2-1 02:59:06 | 顯示全部樓層
vhs 發表於 2019-2-1 01:01
冇呀, 你唔撚玩咪唔撚煩囉,屌

評分

1

查看全部評分

回復

使用道具 舉報

 樓主| 發表於 2019-2-4 01:18:15 | 顯示全部樓層
現在行緊 Roon 時,Windows Server 2016 GUI 的 Processes 是 50, Threads 是 801, Handles 是 21652, CPU Utilization 1 percent , Speed 0.77 GHz, 小弟知道已經不錯了,但不知道若安裝 AO, 可降低 Processes 多少及對音質有冇提升。

評分

1

查看全部評分

回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2019-2-5 13:57:43 | 顯示全部樓層
vhs 發表於 2019-2-4 01:18
現在行緊 Roon 時,Windows Server 2016 GUI 的 Processes 是 50, Threads 是 801, Handles 是 21652, CPU ...

WS 2016 唔用AO (AudiophileOptimizer),音質應該大打折扣。就算同樣使用了AO優化,WS 2016 GUI的音質是差過用WS 2016 CORE,這也是可以分別出來。
回復

使用道具 舉報

 樓主| 發表於 2019-2-5 13:58:31 | 顯示全部樓層
spang123 發表於 2019-2-5 13:57
WS 2016 唔用AO (AudiophileOptimizer),音質應該大打折扣。就算同樣使用了AO優化,WS 2016 GUI的音質是 ...

WS 2016 GUI的音質是差過用WS 2016 CORE......agree.......

評分

1

查看全部評分

回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2019-2-5 14:06:29 | 顯示全部樓層
十分長盡
回復

使用道具 舉報

 樓主| 發表於 2019-2-5 14:07:16 | 顯示全部樓層
本帖最後由 vhs 於 2019-2-5 14:37 編輯


I will try soon.... as follows:

1. Windows Server 2016 Datacenter GUI version with AO2.2 - Roon Core
2. Windows Server 2016 Datacenter Core version with AO2.2 - Roon Core


Then build a NUC and try as follows:

1. Audiolinux - Roon Core

to see the improvement......

評分

1

查看全部評分

回復

使用道具 舉報

發表於 2019-2-5 14:28:44 | 顯示全部樓層
如成功,我跟
回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 新用戶註冊

本版積分規則

Archiver|小黑屋|聯絡我們|刊登廣告|Hiendy.com 影音俱樂部 一個屬於音響愛好者的家

GMT+8, 2024-4-26 00:20 , Processed in 0.046673 second(s), 17 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表