"Do Audiophile Network Switches Make a Difference (video)?"

PhantomGTR

上星期有個電子師兄係 PM send 咗呢條 Thread 俾我睇。入面 ｐｏｓｔ#1 有條片，長係長D，不過入面好多常見既產品名字，同好多 measurements/graphs 去比較。我就絕對無咁既能力去尋根究底了，只能當識多D 嘢。唔知其他師兄睇完覺得同自己個經歷有幾似或有幾唔似呢？
https://www.audiosciencereview.c ... erence-video.20316/

tleonard

Audio Science Review Review
https://www.superbestaudiofriends.org/index.php?threads/audio-science-review-review.9827/

---

https://www.superbestaudiofriends.org/index.php?threads/audiophile-objectivists-vs-subjectivists.9547/

---

極端到乜嘢都要講證據咪又一樣係唔掂，有人攞得到證據出嚟之後又有邊個可以證實佢嘅證據係成立？如此類推：

https://www.evidentlycochrane.net/teapots-and-unicorns-absence-of-evidence-is-not-evidence-of-absence/


https://nutritionfacts.org/video/evidence-based-medicine-or-evidence-biased/


Evidence-based or evidence-biased medicine?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16756200/

How evidence-based medicine is failing due to biased trials and selective publication
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24819404/

基本上信或者唔信任何嘢都已經係有一定程度上嘅偏見，聲稱絕對中立嘅話都只係自欺欺人。

---

娛樂性質嘅嘢有無必要搞到咁很認真呢？只不過係玩具咁大把，用咗嘅錢咪最多再搵過囉，就算換過另一個角度，點都會有人鍾意用『姜太公釣魚』嚟形容嘅話亦都唔覺得有咩唔妥，人哋嘅觀點關我叉事咩，又唔會少忽肉嘅。

Hi Fi 呢樣嘢始終係講個『玩』字，整整吓變咗好似佢哋咁很『科學怪人』嘅成班 objective『科學家』就喪失咗原本嘅意義啦。

AS881

所以即使拎哂證據出來話冇影響都好，咁又有乜關係？因為只要係我聽到有分別咁咪得囉！相反亦一樣！玩啫！買錯又吾使死，咁 serious做乜？

PhantomGTR

Hi-Fi = High Fidelity
當然要求準確，尤其是 digital。何解樓上兩住師兄咁大反應？

dekiller

PhantomGTR 發表於 2021-3-1 13:24
Hi-Fi = High Fidelity
當然要求準確，尤其是 digital。何解樓上兩住師兄咁大反應？ ...

You are BAD BAD guy.