Hiendy.com 影音俱樂部

 找回密碼
 新用戶註冊

Sign in with facebook

Connect with friends.

搜索
熱搜: hifi av 音樂
查看: 23751|回復: 32

[喇叭線] Speaker Cable Selections for current systems

[複製鏈接]
發表於 2013-9-24 13:02:48 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式
本帖最後由 willip 於 2013-9-29 11:04 編輯

Hi all,

After getting the McIntosh 601, decided to keep the Guarneri Memento but feel the current speaker cable (Yter) cannot reach the ultimate highs.

What would be a good choice amongst the above?  I am not familiar with Siltech model, so please suggest.
單選投票, 共有 178 人參與投票
您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
發表於 2013-9-25 07:17:47 | 顯示全部樓層
I have used Siltech 550 sc and Audionote SPXII in my Burmester 082 with Marten Design Miles 5 before. I found that Spx 2 doesn't give enough bass in my present set-up in which the bass is not tight and Deep.  For Siltech 550, its strong Siltech characteristics overtunes the whole system and become Sitech sound. I would definitely not buy Siltech speaker cable though it gives excellent full range and resolution.
發表於 2013-9-25 07:42:45 | 顯示全部樓層
For low price Siltech sc, it has 3 models: 330, 550 and 770. 550 is about 22K and 770 is about 37K. If you like Siltech sound, 550 is value for money out of these 3 models.
 樓主| 發表於 2013-9-25 11:08:27 | 顯示全部樓層
starhifi 發表於 2013-9-25 07:17
I have used Siltech 550 sc and Audionote SPXII in my Burmester 082 with Marten Design Miles 5 before ...

Thanks C Hing,

So you would not suggest to use Siltech at all?

For 1603, how is the high frequency performance?
發表於 2013-9-25 15:53:16 | 顯示全部樓層
Siltech 訊號缐我都會考慮,因分析力全頻低頻很好,音染個性冇Siltech喇叭缐般勁,如部amp夠力,我覺得Audio Note音色最好,但低頻就真是麻麻。
發表於 2013-9-26 01:20:17 | 顯示全部樓層
What speakers and preamp you are using?
發表於 2013-9-26 02:41:24 | 顯示全部樓層
NORDOST/KONDO
 樓主| 發表於 2013-9-26 08:03:38 | 顯示全部樓層
nagramen 發表於 2013-9-26 01:20
What speakers and preamp you are using?

preamp c2500. spk guarneri.
 樓主| 發表於 2013-9-28 08:04:05 | 顯示全部樓層
No other comments?  What is the characteristics of 1603?
發表於 2013-9-28 11:56:51 | 顯示全部樓層
You can take a audience of VOVOX TEXTURA FORTIS or SwissCables Ref series.Both of them have natural, musical and high quality sound .
發表於 2013-9-28 13:45:04 | 顯示全部樓層
For SC, suggest to use Kondo Spz or diy pure silver wire
 樓主| 發表於 2013-9-29 08:16:44 | 顯示全部樓層
nagramen 發表於 2013-9-28 13:45
For SC, suggest to use Kondo Spz or diy pure silver wire

Any DIY pure silver to recommend?
發表於 2013-9-29 10:49:51 | 顯示全部樓層
Just for your reference. I am using Connex Audio Ultimate speaker cables. It is made of sixteen cores of 0.6mm 99.99+% solid silver conductors per channel in oversize PTFE Teflon insulation for 99.9% air dielectric. The performance is much better than the cheap speaker cables I used before and the price is rather inexpensive.   
   
However, I have not used other expensive speaker cables in my system, so I don't know their performance compared with Audio Note and Siltech, etc.   
   
http://www.connexaudio.com/speaker_cables.php   
 樓主| 發表於 2013-10-2 10:07:28 | 顯示全部樓層
Any other recommendations?  It does look like the Yter is a good price/ performance and maybe I should concentrate on looking at RCA between the DAC to Preamp.
發表於 2013-10-2 11:24:22 | 顯示全部樓層
Your whole setup is .... ?
發表於 2013-10-2 11:31:53 | 顯示全部樓層
siltech cable ... 000 tea.gif
Classic Anniversary 330L
Classic Anniversary 550L
Classic Anniversary 770L

評分

1

查看全部評分

發表於 2013-10-2 20:01:13 | 顯示全部樓層
Vote for Audio Note SPX MkIII which is very good at full frequency range performance.
發表於 2013-10-2 20:16:24 | 顯示全部樓層
Newboys 發表於 2013-10-2 20:01
Vote for Audio Note SPX MkIII which is very good at full frequency range performance.

How does SPX MK3 win MK2 in terms of bass performance?

I found that SPX Mk2 is quite weak in bass comparing with Siltech 550L and even another DIY pioneer speaker cable. For full frequency range performance, I concur that 550L is much better than SPX Mk2 though I don't like the vocal of Siltech 550L.   
發表於 2013-10-2 22:58:50 | 顯示全部樓層
I compared SPX II and SPX III.
The result showed SPX III outperform SPX II especially on bass performance.
SPX II gave you good result at mid/high frequency, and transparent sound stage, but weak at bass; while SPX III gave you more solid mid/high frequency and much solid base performance. Both Mk2 and Mk3 delivered wonderful sound stage, and without much coloration on sound character. So Mk3 is a good upgrade path for Mk2 users who love the Mk2 character.
發表於 2013-10-3 08:33:01 | 顯示全部樓層
Newboys 發表於 2013-10-2 22:58
I compared SPX II and SPX III.
The result showed SPX III outperform SPX II especially on bass perfor ...


Yeah! I love AN sound much except for the bass performance.

Can you pm the SPX III price for me. Thx.
您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 新用戶註冊 Sign in with facebook

本版積分規則

小黑屋|Archiver|手機版|聯絡我們|刊登廣告|Hiendy.com 影音俱樂部 一個屬於音響愛好者的家

GMT+8, 2020-1-28 15:03 , Processed in 0.070611 second(s), 21 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表