ATC 同好會

TMSulcata

hksarac 發表於 2012-3-4 14:28
ATC 50 AT 家用版

Hi hksarac Hing,
Actually I mean active  pro vs active classic, you quoted tower version.

TMSulcata

RCA805 發表於 2012-3-4 09:48
電源係一個大學問，我都係一半跟人腳步，花的鈔票多，回報少，但總算效果不太差。

Agree, power supply ...

My optical I/O is not toshilink, this is industrial standard for Lon distant transfer.
Agreed there is pro and con about the optical I/O but in cas, the optical I/O benefit far more than the negative effect.

Listen to ATC active again, very nice, but, seems my small room cannot allow it to sing right....
:(

RCA805

If your optical is not toslink.

I guess that one is AT&T.

I will keep in mind this"""""""""the optical I/O benefit far more than the negative effect in CAS""""""""""""""""""

TMSulcata

RCA805 發表於 2012-3-4 21:14
If your optical is not toslink.

I guess that one is AT&T.

我用LC/LC MM fibre, 預備轉SM，更上層樓。

ATC 的確正，能量感好強，營造音場定位出色，亦因為如此特性，要有足夠擴散呼吸空間，所以聆聽空間同speaker大小比例要配合。
小弟家居狹小，同ATC50無緣了:(

Stryer

TMSulcata 發表於 2012-3-4 23:45
我用LC/LC MM fibre, 預備轉SM，更上層樓。

ATC 的確正，能量感好強，營造音場定位出色，亦因為如此特性 ...

Agree the room size must be matching with speakers, and thus i just can use ATC 20 in this moment. If use 50 or above, need to move home, and this is my dreaming

Stryer

TMSulcata 發表於 2012-3-4 23:45
我用LC/LC MM fibre, 預備轉SM，更上層樓。

ATC 的確正，能量感好強，營造音場定位出色，亦因為如此特性 ...

Agree the room size must be matching with speakers, and thus i just can use ATC 20 in this moment. If use 50 or above, need to move home, and this is my dreaming

Stryer

TMSulcata 發表於 2012-3-4 23:45
我用LC/LC MM fibre, 預備轉SM，更上層樓。

ATC 的確正，能量感好強，營造音場定位出色，亦因為如此特性 ...

Agree the room size must be matching with speakers, and thus i just can use ATC 20 in this moment. If use 50 or above, need to move home, and this is my dreaming

TMSulcata

Stryer 發表於 2012-3-5 00:02
Agree the room size must be matching with speakers, and thus i just can use ATC 20 in this moment. ...

  so can save $$$

Stryer

TMSulcata 發表於 2012-3-5 00:40
so can save $$$

But save $$$ for buying larger room and 50 or above if can

TMSulcata

Stryer 發表於 2012-3-5 07:21
But save $$$ for buying larger room and 50 or above if can

Listened diff models, different place, several times, the conclusion is, ATC50 tower, need a room with >200sqft, and good celing, a difficult target for me....

Stryer

TMSulcata 發表於 2012-3-5 09:14
Listened diff models, different place, several times, the conclusion is, ATC50 tower, need a room  ...

Me too

RCA805

TMSulcata 發表於 2012-3-4 23:45
我用LC/LC MM fibre, 預備轉SM，更上層樓。

ATC 的確正，能量感好強，營造音場定位出色，亦因為如此特性 ...

WHat is """"LC/LC MM fibre, and SM"""""?

TMSulcata

RCA805 發表於 2012-3-5 20:20
WHat is """"LC/LC MM fibre, and SM"""""?

Multi mode, single mode
U may simply google, detailed description from wiki

Hope this is not really off topic, 交番個波比ATC先。

hksarac

TMSulcata 發表於 2012-3-4 15:12
Hi hksarac Hing,
Actually I mean active  pro vs active classic, you quoted tower version.

你想看classic 版???



規格
Specifications

SCM50ASL (Active)

Drivers :
HF 25mm
Mid 75mm
LF 234mm Super Linear
Amplitude Linearity ±2dB :
70Hz - 17kHz
Frequency Response -6dB :
40Hz & 22kHz
Matched Response
±0.5dB
Dispersion :
±80° Coherent Horizontal
±10° Coherent Vertical
Max continuous SPL @1m :
112dB SPL
Crossover Frequency :
380Hz & 3.5kHz
Input Connector :
XLR
Input Sensitivity :
1V
Input Impedance :
>10k ohms balanced XLR
Amplifier Output :
HF 50 Watts RMS
MF 100 Watts RMS
LF 200 Watts RMS
Overload Protection :
LDR tweeter protection, plus active FET MGR (amplifiers)
Power Requirements :
Voltage: 100, 115, 230 (factory set)
Frequency: 50/60Hz
Power: Nominal 90 Watts, Driven 350 Watts
Cabinet Dimensions(HxWxD):
717x304x480mm
including amps
Weight :
48.9kg

ATC UK 網頁
http://www.atcloudspeakers.co.uk/intro.php

Pro 版

hksarac

TMSulcata 發表於 2012-3-4 23:45
我用LC/LC MM fibre, 預備轉SM，更上層樓。

ATC 的確正，能量感好強，營造音場定位出色，亦因為如此特性 ...

音樂味重正，其他的係畀唔到咁正的。

TMSulcata

hksarac 發表於 2012-3-10 18:59
你想看classic 版???

即係除左外表之外，有甚麼不同之處？如單元，配對，用料等。
似乎pro更佳？

TMSulcata

wslam 發表於 2012-2-27 17:37
愧不敢當呀.. ... 小弟呢幾日正物色緊CD機... 等搞掂咗..再約你上來聽多次...   ...

wslam兄，套機配置諗成點啊？
有無針對性地run in 個低？D低至極低基本上係出吾到咁。

hksarac

TMSulcata 發表於 2012-3-10 23:10
即係除左外表之外，有甚麼不同之處？如單元，配對，用料等。
似乎pro更佳？ ...

外國forum講是一樣的，只是個外殼唔同。

TMSulcata

hksarac 發表於 2012-3-11 09:58
外國forum講是一樣的，只是個外殼唔同。

Forum野我一般都係抱開放態度去聽。
我見spec. 上個ferquence response 係吾同既，所以有興趣睇下係乜野因素造成：〉
如果外國forum話一樣，咁有幾個可能性⋯ 嘻嘻

hksarac

Pro 與 家用的只在低頻差2 Hz，分頻也是一樣，可能分音曾改良過。